It's vital that you point your web browser at CodeKit's URL, not MAMP's. Second, click the preview button in the top right of CodeKit button to see the site. Top Con Many features require the 25 powerpack add-on Features like custom workflows, clipboard history, 1Password integrations and others require the powerpack add-on. You'll need to flick the "External Server Required" switch and enter the MAMP URL. Allows the creation of automated workflows by connecting keywords, hotkeys and actions together without writing code. So how do you get Browser Refresh working with an external server like MAMP? It's surprisingly easy:įirst, configure the external server setup in CodeKit's Browser Refresh settings: However, by default the Brower Refresh feature is only available using CodeKit's built in server, which only works with static files (not WordPress' PHP). I use MAMP on my MacBook for running WordPress sites and I use CodeKit for compiling all the CSS and JS files in the themes I'm making. It's particularly great if you've got enough monitor real estate to show both your text editor and web browser at the same time. This makes the write, compile, evaluate loop a lot quicker and can really speed up website development. Join over 14k others.CodeKit's got a great feature called Browser Refresh that refreshes your browser window whenever it does a rebuild of your Sass, Coffeescript or whatever. Hate the complexity of modern front‑end web development? I send out a short email each weekday on how to build a simpler, more resilient web. GUI tools like CodeKit (macOS) and Prepros (macOS, Windows, and Linux) do most of the same things, with a visual interface instead of a Terminal window. I use CodeKit to autorefresh my browsers when I save any files I'm working on it will als. That means I don’t use things like Babel or Typescript.Īnd while I use a command line tool, you don’t need CLI at all! I've been coding in css and thought it's about time to look into sass. My favorite tools let me develop the way I always have, and spit out a slightly enhanced version of my code at the end. You still need a build tool for that.īuild tools don’t require the command lineīuild tools don’t have to be big and complicated, or dramatically change how you develop. There’s no native process for reducing the size of images or SVG files.While minification isn’t as impactful as gzipping, the two together is better than just one or the other, especially on larger sites or apps.If you import one function from a file with a dozen functions in it, the browser is still downloading all dozen of those functions. Native ES modules don’t do any sort of tree shaking.This can create notable delays in running your JavaScript. If you have ES modules nested a few times, the browser has to download the file, compile it, parse it, and download the nested import again before it can run.While modern web development is awesome, there are some limitations that affect performance and user experience… Why you might still want to use build tools It’s possible to build in a modern way and never touch a build tool… but you still may want to. Gzipping is done on the server, and has a much bigger impact on JavaScript performance than minification. CodeKit automatically compiles all those awesome languages you read about in tutorials.All the Cool KidsCompile Sass, Less, Stylus, CSS, CoffeeScript, Pug, Slim, Haml, TypeScript, JavaScript, ES6, Markdown, JSON, SVG, PNG, GIF and JPEG right out of the box.Dead-Simple ConfigurationWant compressed CSS Just check a box.With HTTP/2, you can download a bunch of smaller CSS and JS files simultaneously (you used to be limited to two at a time), removing some of the benefits of concatenating everything into one file.CSS Nesting is in the works, and when its implemented, will provide native support for something else you used to need Sass for.CSS variables let you define properties once and reuse them throughout your CSS, something you used to need Sass for.You can create modular JavaScript files, and import just the parts you need using ES modules.Today, the native web can do a lot of things that we used to have to hack around and use build tools for. This tutorial goes over how to use a third-party application called CodeKit to compile your Sass styles. Are build tools still useful? Let’s dig in! Alternatives to build tools There are all kinds of ways to compile Sass to CSS. What would be nice to see on the blog is alternatives to JS build tools, for example JS modules and import maps.Ī few years ago, I wrote about how build tools aren’t required to be a good developer, but they can be nice to have.Ī lot can change on the web in two years, though. Last week, one of my newsletter readers wrote me to ask…
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |